Arizona sb 1070 what is it

Citation: 8 U. Chamber of Commerce v. The trespassing provision appears to be the first of its kind to be enacted in the United States. In the most recent reports by NCSL on state immigration laws, few states have attempted to create a state trespassing violation for unlawful presence.

Bills were introduced but failed in Arizona in and ; Texas in ; Colorado in ; and California in On the same day she signed the bill, Governor Brewer issued Executive Order requiring the Arizona Peace Officers Standards and Training Board to establish training to ensure law enforcement officials and agencies apply SB consistent with federal laws regulating immigration, protecting the civil rights of all people and respecting the privileges and immunities of United States citizens.

The executive order also requires clear guidance on what constitutes reasonable suspicion. The board is to provide a list of the specific forms of identification that provide a presumption that a person is not an alien unlawfully present in the United States.

A series of questions have been raised about the implementation and constitutionality of Arizona SB Court challenges have raised constitutional issues including due process, equal protection under the 14th amendment, the prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure under the 4th amendment, and preemption under the Supremacy Clause of the U.

On April 29, the last day of legislative session, the Arizona Legislature approved and the governor signed HB that included provisions intended to address the racial profiling concerns.

HB amended SB to specify that law enforcement officials cannot consider race, color or national origin when implementing the provisions of the original law, except as permitted by the U. The law was scheduled to go into effect on July 29, 90 days after the end of regular legislative session.

Parts of the law, however, were enjoined on July 28, Rhode Island HB was introduced by Rep. Palumbo on May Illinois H was introduced by Representative Ramey on November 3, California SCR urges various state and private entities to withhold financial support of Arizona businesses in response to recent Arizona state laws relating to illegal immigration. The resolution was introduced on June Illinois HJR calls upon the Arizona Legislature to repeal SB and asks Congress and the president to act quickly to enact comprehensive immigration reform.

The joint resolution was introduced May 4, adopted by the House on May 7, and is pending in the Senate. In Michigan, HR urges repeal of SB and asks Michigan businesses and public and private organizations to refrain from doing business with or in the state of Arizona. The resolution was introduced on May Michigan HR expresses support for Arizona's new legislation regarding immigration and opposes any boycott of Arizona businesses.

The resolution was introduced on June 9. New York SR denounces policy that encourages racial profiling and asks cooperation on all levels of government to enact immigration policies and laws.

Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Jan Brewer signed it into law, even after courts weakened much of the law.

Arizona Republic journalists looked back at the tumultuous events of but also fast-forwarded to how the law has affected life in the state today. Jan Brewer signed the immigration enforcement law.

Still, the political dynamics and attitudes that resulted in SB never seem too far away. Would the hard-line immigration law pass today? SB made being in the country illegally a state crime. It also made it illegal to fail to carry immigration papers; barred people from hiring or knowingly transporting unauthorized immigrants; and allowed police to detain anyone suspected of being in the country illegally, among other provisions.

What to know about Arizona's SB What it did, what's still in effect and what were the consequences.